Martin v. State

675 So. 2d 246, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6537, 1996 WL 332903
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4359
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 19, 1996·No. No. 95-2036·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Based on the authority of Roberts v. State, 670 So.2d 1042 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), we reverse the order denying the public defender’s motion to withdraw, and remand for a new hearing on appellant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea, where he shall be represented by conflict free counsel. We also reverse the assessment of $50 in costs of prosecution pursuant to section 939.01, Florida Statutes (1995). There was no notice of the state’s intent to seek costs of prosecution and no request by the state that any such costs be assessed. On remand, if the motion to withdraw guilty plea is denied, the state may seek the costs at a properly noticed hearing pursuant to section 939.01.

DELL, STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. State, 675 So. 2d 246, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6537, 1996 WL 332903 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

675 So. 2d 246 (Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roberts v. State
670 So. 2d 1042 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)