Martin v. State

632 So. 2d 1143, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1945, 1994 WL 72258
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 11, 1994·No. No. 93-608·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from convictions for sexual battery and false imprisonment. The only error was the assessment of the state attorney’s fee. That portion of the judgment is stricken. Turkaly v. State, 615 So.2d 222 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Smith v. State, 606 [1144]*1144So .2d 501 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992); Smith v. State, 606 So.2d 427 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

COBB and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. State, 632 So. 2d 1143, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1945, 1994 WL 72258 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

632 So. 2d 1143 (Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. State
652 So. 2d 877 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)