Martin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Martin v. State

591 So. 2d 685, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 361, 1992 WL 7208

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 22, 1992

DocketNo. 91-2810

StatusPublished

This text of 591 So. 2d 685 (Martin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martin v. State, 591 So. 2d 685, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 361, 1992 WL 7208 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Martin appeals the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The post-conviction relief motion alleged ineffectiveness of trial counsel grounded upon allegations of involuntariness of plea and coercion. Although the order summarily denying the rule 3.850 motion refers to portions of the record, not all of the referenced portions are attached to the order as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We, therefore, reverse and remand to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing or for attachment of portions of the record showing the defendant is not entitled to relief. Taylor v. State, 583 So.2d 823 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Gentry v. State, 464 So.2d 659 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).

DOWNEY, DELL and GUNTHER, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Martin appeals the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The post-conviction relief motion alleged ineffectiveness of trial counsel grounded upon allegations of involuntariness of plea and coercion. Although the order summarily denying the rule 3.850 motion refers to portions of the record, not all of the referenced portions are attached to the order as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We, therefore, reverse and remand to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing or for attachment of portions of the record showing the defendant is not entitled to relief. Taylor v. State, 583 So.2d 823 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Gentry v. State, 464 So.2d 659 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).

DOWNEY, DELL and GUNTHER, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

591 So. 2d 685, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 361, 1992 WL 7208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack