Martin v. State

591 So. 2d 685, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 361, 1992 WL 7208
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 547 So. 2d 998
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 22, 1992·No. No. 91-2810·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Martin appeals the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The post-conviction relief motion alleged ineffectiveness of trial counsel grounded upon allegations of involuntariness of plea and coercion. Although the order summarily denying the rule 3.850 motion refers to portions of the record, not all of the referenced portions are attached to the order as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We, therefore, reverse and remand to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing or for attachment of portions of the record showing the defendant is not entitled to relief. Taylor v. State, 583 So.2d 823 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Gentry v. State, 464 So.2d 659 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).

DOWNEY, DELL and GUNTHER, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. State, 591 So. 2d 685, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 361, 1992 WL 7208 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

591 So. 2d 685 (Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gentry v. State
464 So. 2d 659 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Taylor v. State
583 So. 2d 823 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)