Martin v. State

633 So. 2d 121, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 2642, 1994 WL 86491
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 618 So. 2d 737
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 21, 1994·No. No. 92-3211·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, the public defender has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the record satisfies us that no good-faith argument can be made that reversible error occurred regarding either of appellant’s convictions. The same is true as to appellant’s sentence for possession of a short-barrelled shotgun. However, appellant was sentenced for his conviction of aggravated assault with a firearm to three years in prison, to be followed by five years’ probation. This sentence is illegal, because it exceeds the maximum permitted for the third-degree felony of aggravated assault with a firearm. § 784.-021, Fla.Stat. (1991).

[122]*122Appellant’s convictions, and his sentence for possession of a short-barrelled shotgun, are affirmed. Appellant’s sentence for aggravated assault with a firearm is vacated, and the ease is remanded for resentencing as to that offense.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; and REMANDED, with directions.

BOOTH and WEBSTER, JJ., concur. ALLEN, J., concurs in result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. State, 633 So. 2d 121, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 2642, 1994 WL 86491 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

633 So. 2d 121 (Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)