Martin v. State
674 So. 2d 906, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5903, 1996 WL 293408
Opinion
We affirm the revocation of appellant’s probation and the sentence imposed thereon, but direct the trial court, on remand, to enter a written revocation order setting forth the conditions of probation which appellant was found to have violated. See McQuitter v. State, 622 So.2d 590 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993) (when trial court orally pronounces conditions of which probationer, has been found in violation, but fails to place them in written form, remand is necessary for entry of order conforming to oral pronouncement).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Martin v. State, 674 So. 2d 906, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5903, 1996 WL 293408 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
674 So. 2d 906 (Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bowen v. State
684 So. 2d 273 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Wood v. State
682 So. 2d 1217 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)