Martin v. State
777 So. 2d 461, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1396, 2001 WL 121964
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 14, 2001·No. No. 4D99-3279·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s conviction but remand for resentencing as appellant’s sentences were imposed pursuant to both the Habitual Violent Felony Offender statute and the Prison Releasee Reoffender stat[462]*462ute. On remand, the trial court should sentence him only under the Prison Releasee Reoffender statute. See Grant v. State, 770 So.2d 655 (Fla.2000); Yehowshua v. State, 773 So.2d 654 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Martin v. State, 777 So. 2d 461, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1396, 2001 WL 121964 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
777 So. 2d 461 (Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Campbell v. State
777 So. 2d 461 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)