Martin v. State

754 So. 2d 793, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3467, 2000 WL 301094
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 24, 2000
DocketNo. 2D99-4532
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 754 So. 2d 793 (Martin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martin v. State, 754 So. 2d 793, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3467, 2000 WL 301094 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Tyrone E. Martin appeals the trial court’s ruling on his letter seeking mitigation of his sentence. The trial court treated the letter as a motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c), and denied it as untimely. We treat this appeal as petition for writ of certiorari. See Knafel v. State, 714 So.2d 1195 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Brown v. State, 707 So.2d 1191 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). Because Martin’s motion was filed well beyond the sixty-day period set forth in rule 3.800(c) and no manifest injustice has been demonstrated, we deny the petition.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and BLUE, and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sampson v. State
794 So. 2d 611 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Eblin v. State
768 So. 2d 474 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
754 So. 2d 793, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3467, 2000 WL 301094, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.