Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Sampson v. State

Sampson v. State

794 So. 2d 611, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1166, 2001 WL 109193
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 9, 2001
DocketNo. 2D00-4717
StatusPublished

This text of 794 So. 2d 611 (Sampson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sampson v. State, 794 So. 2d 611, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1166, 2001 WL 109193 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PATTERSON, Chief Judge.

Robert Sampson appeals from the dismissal of his motion to reduce sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Pro[612]*612cedure 3.800(c). The trial court dismissed the motion for lack of jurisdiction, and we treat this appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari. See Martin v. State, 754 So.2d 793 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Davis v. State, 745 So.2d 499 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). We deny the petition because Sampson filed his motion to reduce sentence well outside the sixty-day time limit provided for in rule 3.800(c).

BLUE and FULMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davis v. State
745 So. 2d 499 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Martin v. State
754 So. 2d 793 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
794 So. 2d 611, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1166, 2001 WL 109193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sampson-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.