Martin v. State

789 So. 2d 1032, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5817, 2001 WL 456521
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 2, 2001·No. No. 4D01-593·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Following convictions of one count of felony criminal mischief and one count of misdemeanor criminal mischief, appellant was sentenced on November 26, 1997, to three years probation, with a special condition of one year in jail, with credit for time served. He appealed, but his appeal was dismissed by this court on August 13, 1998. He now appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed under rule 3.850. That motion, which was filed more than two years after the dismissal of appellant’s direct appeal, was untimely. We therefore affirm the trial court’s denial of that motion. Nor did the trial court err in denying other motions filed by appellant. Affirmed.

STONE, KLEIN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. State, 789 So. 2d 1032, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5817, 2001 WL 456521 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

789 So. 2d 1032 (Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morris v. State
789 So. 2d 1032 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)