Martin v. State

754 So. 2d 793, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3467, 2000 WL 301094
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 24, 2000·No. No. 2D99-4532·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Tyrone E. Martin appeals the trial court’s ruling on his letter seeking mitigation of his sentence. The trial court treated the letter as a motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c), and denied it as untimely. We treat this appeal as petition for writ of certiorari. See Knafel v. State, 714 So.2d 1195 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Brown v. State, 707 So.2d 1191 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). Because Martin’s motion was filed well beyond the sixty-day period set forth in rule 3.800(c) and no manifest injustice has been demonstrated, we deny the petition.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and BLUE, and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. State, 754 So. 2d 793, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3467, 2000 WL 301094 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

754 So. 2d 793 (Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sampson v. State
794 So. 2d 611 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Eblin v. State
768 So. 2d 474 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)