Home/D.C. Circuit/Law Offices of Seymour M. Chase, P.C. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America

Law Offices of Seymour M. Chase, P.C. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America

843 F.2d 517, 269 U.S. App. D.C. 24, 64 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 1109, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 3804
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedMarch 25, 1988
Docket87-1054
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 843 F.2d 517 (Law Offices of Seymour M. Chase, P.C. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Law Offices of Seymour M. Chase, P.C. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, 843 F.2d 517, 269 U.S. App. D.C. 24, 64 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 1109, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 3804 (D.C. Cir. 1988).

Opinions

Opinion filed by Circuit Judge RUTH BADER GINSBURG.

Opinion concurring in the judgment filed by Circuit Judge WILLIAMS.

Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge WALD.

PER CURIAM:

This petition seeks judicial review of an order of the Federal Communications Com[518]*518mission disqualifying petitioner, an attorney, from continuing to serve as counsel in an ongoing agency proceeding.

Circuit Judge RUTH BADER GINSBURG and Circuit Judge WILLIAMS, each writing separately, join in a judgment dismissing the petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Briggs v. McWeeny
796 A.2d 516 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2002)
Crone v. Gill
736 A.2d 131 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1999)
United States v. Cicero
22 F.3d 1156 (D.C. Circuit, 1994)
United States v. Kendrick Albert Cicero, A/K/A Kenny, A/K/A Diamond, A/K/A Paul Haynes, A/K/A Albert Kenrich Cicero
22 F.3d 1156 (D.C. Circuit, 1994)
Keller and Heckman v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Aeronautical Radio, Inc., Association of American Railroads, Intervenors
984 F.2d 1255 (D.C. Circuit, 1993)
Intercontinental Enterprises, Inc. v. Keller (In Re Blinder Robinson & Co.)
132 B.R. 759 (D. Colorado, 1991)
National Union Fire Insurance v. Seafirst Corp.
891 F.2d 762 (Ninth Circuit, 1989)
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. Seafirst Corporation, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. Seafirst Corporation, and Davis, Wright & Jones, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, and Davis, Wright & Jones Marsh & McLennan Arthur Andersen & Co., Respondent-Intervenor, and Seafirst Corporation, Real Party in Interest
891 F.2d 762 (First Circuit, 1989)
Law Offices of Seymour M. Chase, P.C. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
843 F.2d 517 (D.C. Circuit, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
843 F.2d 517, 269 U.S. App. D.C. 24, 64 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 1109, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 3804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/law-offices-of-seymour-m-chase-pc-v-federal-communications-commission-cadc-1988.