FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 158
Review of orders; time; notice; contents of petition; service
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
On the entry of a final order reviewable under this chapter, the agency shall promptly give notice thereof by service or publication in accordance with its rules. Any party aggrieved by the final order may, within 60 days after its entry, file a petition to review the order in the court of appeals wherein venue lies. The action shall be against the United States. The petition shall contain a concise statement of—
(1)the nature of the proceedings as to which review is sought;
(2)the facts on which venue is based;
(3)the grounds on which relief is sought; and
(4)the relief prayed.
The petitioner shall attach to the petition, as exhibits, copies of the order, report, or decision of the agency. The clerk shall serve a true copy of the petition on the agency and on the Attorney General by r
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
28 U.S.C. § 2344 (Review of orders; time; notice; contents of petition; service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Federal Maritime Commission v. South Carolina State Ports Authority
535 U.S. 743 (Supreme Court, 2002)
Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co.
514 U.S. 122 (Supreme Court, 1995)
Jordan Marks v. Crunch San Diego, LLC
904 F.3d 1041 (Ninth Circuit, 2018)
National Ass'n of State Utility Consumer Advocates v. Federal Communications Commission
457 F.3d 1238 (Eleventh Circuit, 2006)
Brazoria County v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
391 F.3d 685 (Fifth Circuit, 2004)
Kelley v. Selin
42 F.3d 1501 (Sixth Circuit, 1995)
Qwest Communications International, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
240 F.3d 886 (Tenth Circuit, 2001)
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Peña
44 F.3d 437 (Seventh Circuit, 1994)
United States v. Federal Maritime Commission
694 F.2d 793 (D.C. Circuit, 1982)
Mr. Sprout, Inc. v. United States
8 F.3d 118 (Second Circuit, 1993)
National Tank Truck Carriers, Inc. v. Federal Highway Administration of the United States Department of Transportation
170 F.3d 203 (D.C. Circuit, 1999)
Gunaca v. State of Tex.
65 F.3d 467 (Fifth Circuit, 1995)
OXY USA, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
64 F.3d 679 (D.C. Circuit, 1995)
Natural Resources Defense Council v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
823 F.3d 641 (D.C. Circuit, 2016)
Carpenter v. Department of Transportation
13 F.3d 313 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission
69 F.3d 583 (D.C. Circuit, 1995)
Ohio Nuclear-Free Network v. NRC
53 F.4th 236 (D.C. Circuit, 2022)
Baird v. Sabre Inc.
995 F. Supp. 2d 1100 (C.D. California, 2014)
Ishmael Flory v. Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America
528 F.2d 124 (Seventh Circuit, 1975)
Ritter Transportation, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Port Norris Express Co., Inc., Intervenor
697 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Circuit, 1983)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 89–554, §4(e), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 622.)
Editorial Notes
The section is reorganized, with minor changes in phraseology. The words "as prescribed by section 1033 of this title" are omitted as surplusage. The words "of the United States" following "Attorney General" are omitted as unnecessary.