King v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

King v. State

157 S.W.2d 889, 1942 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 582

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in King v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 141 Tex. Crim. 257 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 14, 1942·No. No. 21836·Published

Opinion

■ BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Mary Belle King was tried before the County Judge of Scurry County without the intervention of a jury on a charge of violation of the liquor laws and assessed a penalty of nine months in jail, from which this appeal comes.

The record is before us without bills of exception and without statement of facts. The procedure appears to be regular and we find no error. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

■ BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Mary Belle King was tried before the County Judge of Scurry County without the intervention of a jury on a charge of violation of the liquor laws and assessed a penalty of nine months in jail, from which this appeal comes.

The record is before us without bills of exception and without statement of facts. The procedure appears to be regular and we find no error. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

King v. State, 157 S.W.2d 889, 1942 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 582 (Tex. 1942).

Pincite

157 S.W.2d 889 (King v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.