King v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

King v. State

174 S.W.2d 269

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJune 9, 1943

DocketNo. 22542

StatusPublished

This text of 174 S.W.2d 269 (King v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

King v. State, 174 S.W.2d 269 (Tex. 1943).

Pincite

Opinions

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for possessing for the purpose of sale whisky in Eastland County, a dry area, punishment, a fine of $325.

No bills of exception or statement of facts are in the record. The jurisdiction of the County Court was not challenged at the time of trial,'and we find no brief presenting the question in this case. The point was raised by brief in No. 22541 against the same appellant. Tex.Cr.App., 174 S.W.2d 266. For the reasons set forth in the opinion in that case the judgment here is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for possessing for the purpose of sale whisky in Eastland County, a dry area, punishment, a fine of $325.

No bills of exception or statement of facts are in the record. The jurisdiction of the County Court was not challenged at the time of trial,'and we find no brief presenting the question in this case. The point was raised by brief in No. 22541 against the same appellant. Tex.Cr.App., 174 S.W.2d 266. For the reasons set forth in the opinion in that case the judgment here is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

174 S.W.2d 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-state-texcrimapp-1943.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack