King v. State
174 S.W.2d 269
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in King v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 141 Tex. Crim. 257 →
Opinions
Conviction is for possessing for the purpose of sale whisky in Eastland County, a dry area, punishment, a fine of $325.
No bills of exception or statement of facts are in the record. The jurisdiction of the County Court was not challenged at the time of trial,'and we find no brief presenting the question in this case. The point was raised by brief in No. 22541 against the same appellant. Tex.Cr.App., 174 S.W.2d 266. For the reasons set forth in the opinion in that case the judgment here is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
King v. State, 174 S.W.2d 269 (Tex. 1943).
174 S.W.2d 269 (King v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
King v. State
174 S.W.2d 266 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1943)