King v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

King v. State

137 S.W.2d 1037, 139 Tex. Crim. 23, 1940 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 206

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedFebruary 14, 1940

DocketNo. 20841.

StatusPublished

This text of 137 S.W.2d 1037 (King v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

King v. State, 137 S.W.2d 1037, 139 Tex. Crim. 23, 1940 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 206 (Tex. 1940).

Pincite

Opinions

*24 GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of cattle theft, and by the jury assessed a penalty of six years in the penitentiary.

There are no bills of exception in the record. The statement of facts shows sufficient facts upon which the jury could base their verdict of guilt. The indictment appears to be sufficient, and all proceedings appear to be regular.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*24 GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of cattle theft, and by the jury assessed a penalty of six years in the penitentiary.

There are no bills of exception in the record. The statement of facts shows sufficient facts upon which the jury could base their verdict of guilt. The indictment appears to be sufficient, and all proceedings appear to be regular.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

137 S.W.2d 1037, 139 Tex. Crim. 23, 1940 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-state-texcrimapp-1940.