King v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

King v. State

127 S.W.2d 304

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in King v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 132 Tex. Crim. 200 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 19, 1939·No. No. 20375·Published

Opinion

' KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is theft of cattle; the punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of 6 years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exceptions. The indictment is sufficient to charge the offense, and procedural matters appear to be in due order.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

' KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is theft of cattle; the punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of 6 years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exceptions. The indictment is sufficient to charge the offense, and procedural matters appear to be in due order.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

King v. State, 127 S.W.2d 304 (Tex. 1939).

Pincite

127 S.W.2d 304 (King v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.