King v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

King v. State

92 S.W.2d 241

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedMarch 11, 1936

DocketNo. 18003

StatusPublished

This text of 92 S.W.2d 241 (King v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

King v. State, 92 S.W.2d 241 (Tex. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for possessing intoxicating liquor for purposes of sale; punishment, one year in the penitentiary. '

This is a prosecution had under the provisions of what is known as the Dean Law (Pen.Code 1925, art. 666 et seq., as amended). Following what has been said by us in the case of Guy Meadows v. State, 88 S.W.(2d) 481, the judgment herein will be reversed, and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for possessing intoxicating liquor for purposes of sale; punishment, one year in the penitentiary. '

This is a prosecution had under the provisions of what is known as the Dean Law (Pen.Code 1925, art. 666 et seq., as amended). Following what has been said by us in the case of Guy Meadows v. State, 88 S.W.(2d) 481, the judgment herein will be reversed, and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 S.W.2d 241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-state-texcrimapp-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack