King v. State
97 S.W.2d 954, 131 Tex. Crim. 265, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 523
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in King v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 127 Tex. Crim. 566 →
Opinion
The offense is establishing a lottery; the punishment, a fine of $100.
We find in the transcript a statement by the clerk of the trial court, as follows:
“Defendant not in custody.
[266]*266“Defendant not under recognizance.
“Defendant not under appeal bond.”
Under all of the authorities this court is without jurisdiction. See Grant v. State, 7 S. W. (2d) 90.
The appeal is dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.
The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
King v. State, 97 S.W.2d 954, 131 Tex. Crim. 265, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 523 (Tex. 1936).
97 S.W.2d 954 (King v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Grant v. State
7 S.W.2d 90 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)