King v. State

65 S.W.2d 774, 125 Tex. Crim. 65, 1933 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 623
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in King v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 117 Tex. Crim. 43
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 15, 1933·No. No. 16123.·Published

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Unlawfully selling intoxicating liquor is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

A plea of guilty was entered. A jury was waived and the case tried before the court.

The evidence shows that the witness Williams purchased a pint of whisky from the appellant and paid him a dollar therefor, which fact was not controverted.

There are no bills of exception in the record. No error or irregularity has been perceived which would warrant a reversal or require discussion.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. State, 65 S.W.2d 774, 125 Tex. Crim. 65, 1933 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 623 (Tex. 1933).

65 S.W.2d 774 (King v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.