King v. State
137 S.W.2d 1037, 139 Tex. Crim. 23, 1940 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 206
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in King v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 132 Tex. Crim. 200 →
Opinions
Appellant was convicted of cattle theft, and by the jury assessed a penalty of six years in the penitentiary.
There are no bills of exception in the record. The statement of facts shows sufficient facts upon which the jury could base their verdict of guilt. The indictment appears to be sufficient, and all proceedings appear to be regular.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
King v. State, 137 S.W.2d 1037, 139 Tex. Crim. 23, 1940 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 206 (Tex. 1940).
137 S.W.2d 1037 (King v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.