Jose Francisco Nunes v. John Ashcroft, United States Attorney General
This text of 375 F.3d 810 (Jose Francisco Nunes v. John Ashcroft, United States Attorney General) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ORDER AND DISSENTS DENYING REHEARING EN BANC
ORDER
The opinion filed November 3, 2003, and appearing at 348 F.3d 815 (9th Cir.2003), is amended by the opinion filed simultaneously with this order.
With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Judges Rymer and Tallman have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Leighton so recommends.
The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. An active judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonre-cused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
375 F.3d 810, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 14092, 2004 WL 1516777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-francisco-nunes-v-john-ashcroft-united-states-attorney-general-ca9-2004.