Jose Francisco Nunes v. John Ashcroft, United States Attorney General

375 F.3d 810, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 14092, 2004 WL 1516777
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 8, 2004·No. 02-55613·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

ORDER AND DISSENTS DENYING REHEARING EN BANC

ORDER

The opinion filed November 3, 2003, and appearing at 348 F.3d 815 (9th Cir.2003), is amended by the opinion filed simultaneously with this order.

With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Judges Rymer and Tallman have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Leighton so recommends.

The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. An active judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonre-cused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jose Francisco Nunes v. John Ashcroft, United States Attorney General, 375 F.3d 810, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 14092, 2004 WL 1516777 (9th Cir. 2004).

375 F.3d 810 (Jose Francisco Nunes v. John Ashcroft, United States Attorney General) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stonelake v. Meta Platforms Inc
W.D. Washington, 2025
Nahum v. The Boeing Company
W.D. Washington, 2019
APL Co. Pte. Ltd. v. UK Aerosols Ltd., Inc.
452 F. Supp. 2d 939 (N.D. California, 2006)
Nordberg v. Trilegiant Corp.
445 F. Supp. 2d 1082 (N.D. California, 2006)