FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 153

Application

Current through Pub. L. 119-102
Application for a writ of habeas corpus shall be in writing signed and verified by the person for whose relief it is intended or by someone acting in his behalf. It shall allege the facts concerning the applicant's commitment or detention, the name of the person who has custody over him and by virtue of what claim or authority, if known. It may be amended or supplemented as provided in the rules of procedure applicable to civil actions. If addressed to the Supreme Court, a justice thereof or a circuit judge it shall state the reasons for not making application to the district court of the district in which the applicant is held.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

28 U.S.C. § 2242 (Application) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rumsfeld v. Padilla
542 U.S. 426 (Supreme Court, 2004)
2,889 case citations
Carey v. Saffold
536 U.S. 214 (Supreme Court, 2002)
1,053 case citations
Al Odah, Khaled A.F. v. United States
321 F.3d 1134 (D.C. Circuit, 2003)
75 case citations
Boumediene, Lakhdar v. Bush, George
476 F.3d 981 (D.C. Circuit, 2007)
55 case citations
Eric D. Clemmons v. Paul K. Delo
177 F.3d 680 (Eighth Circuit, 1999)
23 case citations
Kruger v. Erickson
875 F. Supp. 583 (D. Minnesota, 1995)
10 case citations
Carter v. Bradshaw
644 F.3d 329 (Sixth Circuit, 2011)
9 case citations
Beckford v. Lynch
168 F. Supp. 3d 533 (W.D. New York, 2016)
4 case citations
Humes v. Robbins
121 F. Supp. 552 (D. Maine, 1954)
2 case citations
Rowley v. Barron
(W.D. Washington, 2024)
Norton v. Barron
(W.D. Washington, 2024)
Wilder v. Whitehouse
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Jackson v. Hepp
(E.D. Wisconsin, 2019)
Bell v. Mason
(W.D. Washington, 2024)
Roberts v. Payne
(E.D. Arkansas, 2020)
Burrus v. Jackson
(W.D. Washington, 2024)
Caril v. State of Washington
(W.D. Washington, 2024)

Source Credit

History

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 965.)

Editorial Notes

Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §454 (R.S. §754).
Words "or by someone acting in his behalf" were added. This follows the actual practice of the courts, as set forth in United States ex rel. Funaro v. Watchorn, C.C. 1908, 164 F. 152; Collins v. Traeger, C.C.A. 1928, 27 F.2d 842, and cases cited.
The third paragraph is new. It was added to conform to existing practice as approved by judicial decisions. See Dorsey v. Gill (App.D.C.) 148 F.2d 857, 865, 866. See also Holiday v. Johnston, 61 S.Ct. 1015, 313 U.S. 342, 85 L.Ed. 1392.
Changes were made in phraseology.