FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 153
Application
28 U.S.C. § 2242
Title28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter153 — HABEAS CORPUS
This text of 28 U.S.C. § 2242 (Application) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 2242.
Text
Application for a writ of habeas corpus shall be in writing signed and verified by the person for whose relief it is intended or by someone acting in his behalf.
It shall allege the facts concerning the applicant's commitment or detention, the name of the person who has custody over him and by virtue of what claim or authority, if known.
It may be amended or supplemented as provided in the rules of procedure applicable to civil actions.
If addressed to the Supreme Court, a justice thereof or a circuit judge it shall state the reasons for not making application to the district court of the district in which the applicant is held.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Rumsfeld v. Padilla
542 U.S. 426 (Supreme Court, 2004)
Carey v. Saffold
536 U.S. 214 (Supreme Court, 2002)
Al Odah, Khaled A.F. v. United States
321 F.3d 1134 (D.C. Circuit, 2003)
Boumediene, Lakhdar v. Bush, George
476 F.3d 981 (D.C. Circuit, 2007)
Eric D. Clemmons v. Paul K. Delo
177 F.3d 680 (Eighth Circuit, 1999)
Kruger v. Erickson
875 F. Supp. 583 (D. Minnesota, 1995)
Carter v. Bradshaw
644 F.3d 329 (Sixth Circuit, 2011)
In Re Bruce Wayne Morris, Bruce Wayne Morris v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California (Sacramento), Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, Real Party in Interest
363 F.3d 891 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)
Beckford v. Lynch
168 F. Supp. 3d 533 (W.D. New York, 2016)
Humes v. Robbins
121 F. Supp. 552 (D. Maine, 1954)
Eggleson v. Pierce County Superior Court
(W.D. Washington, 2022)
Rowley v. Barron
(W.D. Washington, 2024)
Shaw v. Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Norton v. Barron
(W.D. Washington, 2024)
Wilder v. Whitehouse
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Jackson v. Hepp
(E.D. Wisconsin, 2019)
Bell v. Mason
(W.D. Washington, 2024)
Roberts v. Payne
(E.D. Arkansas, 2020)
Burrus v. Jackson
(W.D. Washington, 2024)
Caril v. State of Washington
(W.D. Washington, 2024)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 965.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §454 (R.S. §754).
Words "or by someone acting in his behalf" were added. This follows the actual practice of the courts, as set forth in United States ex rel. Funaro v. Watchorn, C.C. 1908, 164 F. 152; Collins v. Traeger, C.C.A. 1928, 27 F.2d 842, and cases cited.
The third paragraph is new. It was added to conform to existing practice as approved by judicial decisions. See Dorsey v. Gill (App.D.C.) 148 F.2d 857, 865, 866. See also Holiday v. Johnston, 61 S.Ct. 1015, 313 U.S. 342, 85 L.Ed. 1392.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §454 (R.S. §754).
Words "or by someone acting in his behalf" were added. This follows the actual practice of the courts, as set forth in United States ex rel. Funaro v. Watchorn, C.C. 1908, 164 F. 152; Collins v. Traeger, C.C.A. 1928, 27 F.2d 842, and cases cited.
The third paragraph is new. It was added to conform to existing practice as approved by judicial decisions. See Dorsey v. Gill (App.D.C.) 148 F.2d 857, 865, 866. See also Holiday v. Johnston, 61 S.Ct. 1015, 313 U.S. 342, 85 L.Ed. 1392.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 2242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/2242.