Burrus v. Jackson

• Court: District Court, W.D. Washington
• Decided: January 10, 2024
• Docket: 2:23-cv-01968
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3

4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 9 10 CHRISTOPHER SEAN BURRUS, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-01968-BHS-GJL 11 Petitioner, v. ORDER ON MOTION FOR 12 EXTENSION OF FILING ROBERT JACKSON, DEADLINE AND TO APPOINT 13 COUNSEL Respondent. 14 15 The District Court has referred this 28 U.S.C. § 2254 action to United States Magistrate 16 Judge Grady J. Leupold. This matter is before the Court on Petitioner Christopher Burrus’ 17 motions for an extension of the deadline by which he shall submit his habeas petition (Dkt. 4) 18 and for court-appointed counsel (Dkt. 1-1).1 19 20 21

22 1 Petitioner also filed an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”). Dkt. 1. The Court declines to 23 consider the IFP Application until Petitioner has cured the deficiency in that application by filing his habeas petition. 24 1 I. MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL TIME TO FILE § 2254 HABEAS PETITION (DKT. 4) 2 On December 21, 2023, the Clerk mailed Petitioner a Notice of Filing Deficiency 3 informing him that the deadline for filing his habeas petition is January 22, 2024. Dkt. 2. In 4 response, Petitioner requested additional time to file. See Dkt. 4. 5 Upon review, Petitioner’s motion for an extension is well taken. The Court reminds 6 Petitioner that, under Rule 2(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, “the petition must 7 name as respondent the state officer who has custody.” Further, the petition must: 8 (1) specify all the grounds for relief available to the petitioner; (2) state the facts 9 supporting each ground; (3) state the relief requested; (4) be printed, typewritten, or legibly handwritten; and (5) be signed under penalty of perjury by the petitioner or 10 person authorized to sign it for the petitioner under 28 U.S.C. §2242.

11 Id. at Rule 2(c). The petition must also “substantially follow” a form prescribed by the local district 12 court or the form attached to the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Id. at Rule 2(d). 13 Petitioner is advised that his petition should consist of a short and plain statement 14 showing he is entitled to relief. Petitioner should clearly, and with specificity, allege how and on 15 what grounds he is challenging his state-court sentence. The claims that Petitioner intends to 16 pursue in his habeas petition should be identified as: ground one, ground two, etc. Petitioner 17 must file the petition on the court-approved form, and he may attach one memorandum in 18 support of the petition that includes all arguments he wishes to consider. 19 Accordingly, Petitioner’s Motion for Additional Time to File (Dkt. 4) is GRANTED. 20 Petitioner has until February 22, 2024, to file his § 2254 petition or to seek an extension of time 21 to file. In addition, the Clerk is directed to send Petitioner a copy of the court-approved form for 22 § 2254 habeas petitions. 23 24 1 II. MOTION FOR COURT-APPOINTED COUNSEL (DKT. 1-1) 2 Petitioner also moved for court-appointed counsel. Dkt. 1-1. However, the right to court- 3 appointed counsel in cases brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is limited to instances where an

4 evidentiary hearing is required, appointed counsel is “necessary for the effective utilization of 5 discovery procedures,” or the interest of justice so requires. See McCleskey v. Zant, 499 U.S. 6 467, 495 (1991); United States v. Duarte-Higareda, 68 F.3d 369, 370 (9th Cir. 1995); United 7 States v. Angelone, 894 F.2d 1129, 1130 (9th Cir. 1990); Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 8 (9th Cir. 1983); Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts 6(a) 9 and 8(c). Although the interest of justice may require the appointment of counsel prior to the 10 start of discovery, the Court must first “evaluate the likelihood of success on the merits as well as 11 the ability of the petitioner to articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal 12 issues involved.” Weygandt, 718 F.2d at 754.

13 Here, Petitioner has not yet filed his habeas petition and, thus, has not demonstrated the 14 circumstances required for the Court to appoint counsel. Stated otherwise, Petitioner’s request 15 for court-appointed counsel is premature. 16 Accordingly, Petitioner’s Motion to Appoint Counsel (Dkt. 1-1) is DENIED without 17 prejudice. 18 III. CONCLUSION 19 For the reasons stated, Petitioner’s Motion for Additional Time to File (Dkt. 4) is 20 GRANTED. Petitioner has until February 22, 2024, to file his habeas petition or to seek an 21 extension of time to file. Petitioner’s Motion to Appoint Counsel (Dkt. 1-1) is DENIED without 22 prejudice.

23 24 1 The Clerk is directed to send Petitioner a copy of the court-approved form for § 2254 2 habeas petitions. 3 Dated this 10th day of January, 2024.

4 A 5 6 Grady J. Leupold United States Magistrate Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24