FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 153

Appeal

28 U.S.C. § 2253

This text of 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Appeal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 2253.

Text

(a)In a habeas corpus proceeding or a proceeding under section 2255 before a district judge, the final order shall be subject to review, on appeal, by the court of appeals for the circuit in which the proceeding is held.
(b)There shall be no right of appeal from a final order in a proceeding to test the validity of a warrant to remove to another district or place for commitment or trial a person charged with a criminal offense against the United States, or to test the validity of such person's detention pending removal proceedings.
(c)(1) Unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability, an appeal may not be taken to the court of appeals from—
(A)the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding in which the detention complained of arises out of process issued by a St

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carlos Ayestas v. William Stephens, Director
817 F.3d 888 (Fifth Circuit, 2016)
11 case citations
Vincent Pitts v. Warden Lee Correctional
635 F. App'x 113 (Fourth Circuit, 2016)
1 case citations
Ervin Lopez v. Larry Cartledge
642 F. App'x 287 (Fourth Circuit, 2016)
1 case citations
United States v. Augustine DeCruz
644 F. App'x 189 (Third Circuit, 2016)
United States v. Stanley Waddell
641 F. App'x 296 (Fourth Circuit, 2016)
United States v. Ronnie Rand
641 F. App'x 292 (Fourth Circuit, 2016)
United States v. Jeremy Pratt
642 F. App'x 202 (Fourth Circuit, 2016)
United States v. Terry Mitchell
633 F. App'x 210 (Fourth Circuit, 2016)
United States v. Wilbert Sampson
641 F. App'x 290 (Fourth Circuit, 2016)
Gregston Marshall v. Larry Edmonds
641 F. App'x 278 (Fourth Circuit, 2016)
Jackson v. McCollum
644 F. App'x 814 (Tenth Circuit, 2016)
United States v. Bellamy
349 F. App'x 830 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)
Kenneth Workman v. Randy Blades
645 F. App'x 542 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
United States v. John Washington
641 F. App'x 275 (Fourth Circuit, 2016)
United States v. James Goff
641 F. App'x 272 (Fourth Circuit, 2016)
Ramon Cunningham v. Frank Perry
633 F. App'x 209 (Fourth Circuit, 2016)
Alonzo Greene v. Bobby Marshall
641 F. App'x 274 (Fourth Circuit, 2016)
Jessie Bradshaw v. Harold Clarke
641 F. App'x 277 (Fourth Circuit, 2016)
James Desper v. John Woodson
633 F. App'x 212 (Fourth Circuit, 2016)
Willie Coley v. Harold Clarke
635 F. App'x 126 (Fourth Circuit, 2016)

Source Credit

History

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 967; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §113, 63 Stat. 105; Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 655, §52, 65 Stat. 727; Pub. L. 104–132, title I, §102, Apr. 24, 1996, 110 Stat. 1217.)

Editorial Notes

Historical and Revision Notes

1948 Act
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§463(a) and 466 (Mar. 10, 1908, ch. 76, 36 [35] Stat. 40; Feb. 13, 1925, ch. 229, §§6, 13, 43 Stat. 940, 942; June 29, 1938, ch. 806, 52 Stat. 1232).
This section consolidates paragraph (a) of section 463, and section 466 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed.
The last two sentences of section 463(a) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., were omitted. They were repeated in section 452 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed. (See reviser's note under section 2241 of this title.)
Changes were made in phraseology.

1949 Act
This section corrects a typographical error in the second paragraph of section 2253 of title 28.

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1996—Pub. L. 104–132 reenacted section catchline without change and amended text generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows:
"In a habeas corpus proceeding before a circuit or district judge, the final order shall be subject to review, on appeal, by the court of appeals for the circuit where the proceeding is had.
"There shall be no right of appeal from such an order in a proceeding to test the validity of a warrant to remove, to another district or place for commitment or trial, a person charged with a criminal offense against the United States, or to test the validity of his detention pending removal proceedings.
"An appeal may not be taken to the court of appeals from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding where the detention complained of arises out of process issued by a State court, unless the justice or judge who rendered the order or a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of probable cause."
1951—Act Oct. 31, 1951, substituted "to remove, to another district or place for commitment or trial, a person charged with a criminal offense against the United States, or to test the validity of his" for "of removal issued pursuant to section 3042 of Title 18 or the" in second par.
1949—Act May 24, 1949, substituted "3042" for "3041" in second par.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 2253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/2253.