United States v. Bellamy
This text of United States v. Bellamy (United States v. Bellamy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-4037
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CHUCK WILLIE BELLAMY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:05-cr-01036-TLW-1)
Submitted: June 22, 2009 Decided: June 29, 2009
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Chuck Willie Bellamy, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Chuck Willie Bellamy appeals from the district court’s
order granting the Government’s Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion
and reducing Bellamy’s term of imprisonment from 216 to 120
months. On appeal, Bellamy challenges the extent of the
district court’s departure, which this court has no jurisdiction
to consider on appeal, absent circumstances not here alleged.
See United States v. Hill, 70 F.3d 321, 324 (4th Cir. 1995).
Accordingly, we deny Bellamy’s motion for appointment of
counsel, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Bellamy, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bellamy-ca4-2009.