United States v. Bellamy

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Bellamy. Read the opinion of the Court — 336 F. App'x 285
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 29, 2009·No. 09-4037·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-4037

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CHUCK WILLIE BELLAMY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:05-cr-01036-TLW-1)

Submitted: June 22, 2009 Decided: June 29, 2009

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Chuck Willie Bellamy, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Chuck Willie Bellamy appeals from the district court’s

order granting the Government’s Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion

and reducing Bellamy’s term of imprisonment from 216 to 120

months. On appeal, Bellamy challenges the extent of the

district court’s departure, which this court has no jurisdiction

to consider on appeal, absent circumstances not here alleged.

See United States v. Hill, 70 F.3d 321, 324 (4th Cir. 1995).

Accordingly, we deny Bellamy’s motion for appointment of

counsel, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Bellamy, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Bellamy (United States v. Bellamy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Stephan Gary Hill
70 F.3d 321 (Fourth Circuit, 1995)