Doescher v. Aragon

District Court, E.D. California·Decided January 24, 2024·No. 2:23-cv-02995·Unknown

Opinion

, No. Plaintiff, ORDER SETTING STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE v , Defendant. This action has been assigned to the Honorable Kimberly J. Mueller. Both the court and the attorneys bear responsibility for the progress of litigation in the federal courts. To secure the just, speedy and inexpensive determination of every action, Fed. R. Civ. P. 1, all counsel are ordered to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rules of the Eastern District of California, as well as this order and the court’s civil standing order located on the court’s webpage. As provided by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 and Local Rule 240, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. A Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is set for _____________ at ______________ before Judge Mueller in Courtroom Three. Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conferences are generally held via videoconference. However, because the format of these hearings is subject to changes depending on the circumstances of each case, check the courtroom calendar to confirm the format of the hearing. DAYS prior to the scheduled conference. 2. Plaintiff(s) shall complete service of process on all parties within ninety (90) days of the date of the filing of the complaint, to allow the court to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b). 3. Concurrently with the service of process, or as soon thereafter as possible, plaintiff(s) shall serve upon each of the parties named in the complaint, and upon all parties subsequently joined, a copy of this order, and shall file with the Clerk of the Court a certificate reflecting such service. Any party who impleads a third-party defendant shall serve upon that party a copy of this order and shall file with the Clerk of the Court a certificate reflecting such service. 4. In the event this action was originally filed in a state court and was thereafter removed to this court, the removing party or parties shall, immediately following such removal, serve upon each of the other parties named in the complaint, and upon all parties subsequently joined, a copy of this order and shall file with the Clerk of the Court a certificate reflecting such service. 5. Unless both parties agree discovery would be premature or the parties have a material dispute about whether early discovery is appropriate, it is advisable for counsel to begin to conduct discovery actively before the Initial Scheduling Conference. At the very least, the parties shall comply fully with the letter and spirit of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) and promptly produce and obtain what they are required to in the early stages of discovery. 6. At least twenty-one (21) calendar days before the Status Conference is held, parties shall confer as contemplated by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 and Local Rule 240(b). The parties shall submit, at least fourteen (14) days prior to the Status Conference, a Joint Status Report that includes the Rule 26(f) discovery plan, with all named parties participating in the preparation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doescher v. Aragon, (E.D. Cal. 2024).

Doescher v. Aragon (Doescher v. Aragon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related