In re Williams

472 F. App'x 269
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 3, 2012
DocketNo. 12-1140
StatusPublished

This text of 472 F. App'x 269 (In re Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Williams, 472 F. App'x 269 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Harry James Williams petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2011). He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied the motion on March 21, 2012. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Williams’ motion, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We also deny Williams’ pending motion for a certifícate of appealability without prejudice to his ability to re-file it in his direct appeal from the district court’s denial of his § 2255 motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
472 F. App'x 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-williams-ca4-2012.