In Re: Williams

419 F. App'x 324
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In Re: Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 306 F. App'x 818
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 21, 2011·No. 11-1068·Unpublished

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David W. Williams petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order compelling his transfer to another correctional facility. We conclude that Williams is not entitled to mandamus relief.

Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402, 96 S.Ct. 2119, 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976); United States v. Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir. *325 2003). Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir.1988).

The relief sought by Williams is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re: Williams, 419 F. App'x 324 (4th Cir. 2011).

419 F. App'x 324 (In Re: Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Moussaoui
333 F.3d 509 (Fourth Circuit, 2003)
First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Baker
860 F.2d 135 (Fourth Circuit, 1988)