In re Williams

288 F. App'x 906
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 306 F. App'x 818
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 18, 2008·No. No. 08-1653·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Stanley Lorenzo Williams petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Although we find that mandamus relief is not warranted because the delay is not unreasonable, we deny the mandamus petition without prejudice to the filing of another mandamus petition if the district court does not act expeditiously. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Williams’ motion for stay of execution of state court sentences and to expedite consideration of the motion to stay is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Williams, 288 F. App'x 906 (4th Cir. 2008).

288 F. App'x 906 (In re Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related