In re Williams

186 F. App'x 334
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 306 F. App'x 818
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 21, 2006·No. No. 06-6844·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Rodney H. Williams petitions for a writ of error pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (2000) and Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Williams claims the July 29, 2003, opinion issued in his direct appeal relied upon perjurous statements in the record. Because Williams does not have a right to the relief sought, we deny relief. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of error. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Williams, 186 F. App'x 334 (4th Cir. 2006).

186 F. App'x 334 (In re Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Writs
28 U.S.C. § 1651(a)