FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 111
Writs
28 U.S.C. § 1651
Title28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter111 — GENERAL PROVISIONS
This text of 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (Writs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 1651.
Text
(a)The Supreme Court and all courts established by Act of Congress may issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective jurisdictions and agreeable to the usages and principles of law.
(b)An alternative writ or rule nisi may be issued by a justice or judge of a court which has jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
American Heritage Life Insurance v. Orr
294 F.3d 702 (Fifth Circuit, 2002)
Gary Bryant v. Ford Motor Co.
832 F.2d 1080 (Ninth Circuit, 1987)
United States v. Brian Wilkozek
822 F.3d 364 (Seventh Circuit, 2016)
Kreig v. Prairie Island Dakota Sioux
21 F.3d 302 (Eighth Circuit, 1994)
In Re: Lawrence Wilder, Sr. v.
653 F. App'x 212 (Fourth Circuit, 2016)
Theodore Young, Sr. v.
639 F. App'x 72 (Third Circuit, 2016)
Amer Heritage Life v. Martin
(Fifth Circuit, 2002)
Navigators Insurance v. Moncla Marine Operations, L.L.C.
567 F. App'x 258 (Fifth Circuit, 2014)
Williams v. Lawson
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Tran v. Clark County Court
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Tran v. Hagenson
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Tran v. United States of America Congress Lawmakers
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Tran v. United States Government
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Tran v. Osler
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Smith v. United States Congress
(E.D. Wisconsin, 2019)
In the Guardianship of: Omana Thankamma
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Freeze v. McDermott
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Prop-Jets, Inc. v. The Honorable Stephen S. Chandler, United States District Judge for the Western District of Oklahoma, R. J. Enstrom Corporation v. Interceptor Corporation and United States of America, Prop-Jets, Inc.
575 F.2d 1322 (Tenth Circuit, 1978)
McGlown v. Asia People's Republic
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Sahm v. Ali
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 944; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §90, 63 Stat. 102.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
1948 Act
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§342, 376, 377 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §§234, 261, 262, 36 Stat. 1156, 1162).
Section consolidates sections 342, 376, and 377 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., with necessary changes in phraseology.
Such section 342 provided:
"The Supreme Court shall have power to issue writs of prohibition to the district courts, when proceeding as courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction; and writs of mandamus, in cases warranted by the principles and usages of law, to any courts appointed under the authority of the United States, or to persons holding office under the authority of the United States, where a State, or an ambassador, or other public minister, or a consul, or vice consul is a party."
Such section 376 provided:
"Writs of ne exeat may be granted by any justice of the Supreme Court, in cases where they might be granted by the Supreme Court; and by any district judge, in cases where they might be granted by the district court of which he is a judge. But no writ of ne exeat shall be granted unless a suit in equity is commenced, and satisfactory proof is made to the court or judge granting the same that the defendant designs quickly to depart from the United States."
Such section 377 provided:
"The Supreme Court and the district courts shall have power to issue writs of scire facias. The Supreme Court, the circuit courts of appeals, and the district courts shall have power to issue all writs not specifically provided for by statute, which may be necessary for the exercise of their respective jurisdictions, and agreeable to the usages and principles of law."
The special provisions of section 342 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., with reference to writs of prohibition and mandamus, admiralty courts and other courts and officers of the United States were omitted as unnecessary in view of the revised section.
The revised section extends the power to issue writs in aid of jurisdiction, to all courts established by Act of Congress, thus making explicit the right to exercise powers implied from the creation of such courts.
The provisions of section 376 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., with respect to the powers of a justice or judge in issuing writs of ne exeat were changed and made the basis of subsection (b) of the revised section but the conditions and limitations on the writ of ne exeat were omitted as merely confirmatory of well-settled principles of law.
The provision in section 377 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., authorizing issuance of writs of scire facias, was omitted in view of rule 81(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure abolishing such writ. The revised section is expressive of the construction recently placed upon such section by the Supreme Court in U.S. Alkali Export Assn. v. U.S., 65 S.Ct. 1120, 325 U.S. 196, 89 L.Ed. 1554, and De Beers Consol. Mines v. U.S., 65 S.Ct. 1130, 325 U.S. 212, 89 L.Ed. 1566.
1949 Act
This section corrects a grammatical error in subsection (a) of section 1651 of title 28, U.S.C.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1949—Subsec. (a). Act May 24, 1949, inserted "and" after "jurisdictions".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Writ of Error
Act Jan. 31, 1928, ch. 14, §2, 45 Stat. 54, as amended Apr. 26, 1928, ch. 440, 45 Stat. 466; June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §23, 62 Stat. 990, provided that: "All Acts of Congress referring to writs of error shall be construed as amended to the extent necessary to substitute appeal for writ of error."
1948 Act
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§342, 376, 377 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §§234, 261, 262, 36 Stat. 1156, 1162).
Section consolidates sections 342, 376, and 377 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., with necessary changes in phraseology.
Such section 342 provided:
"The Supreme Court shall have power to issue writs of prohibition to the district courts, when proceeding as courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction; and writs of mandamus, in cases warranted by the principles and usages of law, to any courts appointed under the authority of the United States, or to persons holding office under the authority of the United States, where a State, or an ambassador, or other public minister, or a consul, or vice consul is a party."
Such section 376 provided:
"Writs of ne exeat may be granted by any justice of the Supreme Court, in cases where they might be granted by the Supreme Court; and by any district judge, in cases where they might be granted by the district court of which he is a judge. But no writ of ne exeat shall be granted unless a suit in equity is commenced, and satisfactory proof is made to the court or judge granting the same that the defendant designs quickly to depart from the United States."
Such section 377 provided:
"The Supreme Court and the district courts shall have power to issue writs of scire facias. The Supreme Court, the circuit courts of appeals, and the district courts shall have power to issue all writs not specifically provided for by statute, which may be necessary for the exercise of their respective jurisdictions, and agreeable to the usages and principles of law."
The special provisions of section 342 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., with reference to writs of prohibition and mandamus, admiralty courts and other courts and officers of the United States were omitted as unnecessary in view of the revised section.
The revised section extends the power to issue writs in aid of jurisdiction, to all courts established by Act of Congress, thus making explicit the right to exercise powers implied from the creation of such courts.
The provisions of section 376 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., with respect to the powers of a justice or judge in issuing writs of ne exeat were changed and made the basis of subsection (b) of the revised section but the conditions and limitations on the writ of ne exeat were omitted as merely confirmatory of well-settled principles of law.
The provision in section 377 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., authorizing issuance of writs of scire facias, was omitted in view of rule 81(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure abolishing such writ. The revised section is expressive of the construction recently placed upon such section by the Supreme Court in U.S. Alkali Export Assn. v. U.S., 65 S.Ct. 1120, 325 U.S. 196, 89 L.Ed. 1554, and De Beers Consol. Mines v. U.S., 65 S.Ct. 1130, 325 U.S. 212, 89 L.Ed. 1566.
1949 Act
This section corrects a grammatical error in subsection (a) of section 1651 of title 28, U.S.C.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1949—Subsec. (a). Act May 24, 1949, inserted "and" after "jurisdictions".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Writ of Error
Act Jan. 31, 1928, ch. 14, §2, 45 Stat. 54, as amended Apr. 26, 1928, ch. 440, 45 Stat. 466; June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §23, 62 Stat. 990, provided that: "All Acts of Congress referring to writs of error shall be construed as amended to the extent necessary to substitute appeal for writ of error."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 1651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/1651.