In re Williams
This text of 91 F. App'x 865 (In re Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Michael Antwon Williams brought this mandamus action seeking to compel the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina to issue a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction against several defendants Williams named in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. Williams has failed to demonstrate that he has a clear and indisputable right to mandamus relief and that there are no other adequate means for obtaining the relief sought. Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc., 449 U.S. 33, 35, 101 S.Ct. 188, 66 L.Ed.2d 193 (1980). Accordingly, we deny the petition for mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 F. App'x 865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-williams-ca4-2004.