In re Williams

91 F. App'x 865
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 25, 2004
DocketNo. 03-7344
StatusPublished

This text of 91 F. App'x 865 (In re Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Williams, 91 F. App'x 865 (4th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Michael Antwon Williams brought this mandamus action seeking to compel the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina to issue a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction against several defendants Williams named in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. Williams has failed to demonstrate that he has a clear and indisputable right to mandamus relief and that there are no other adequate means for obtaining the relief sought. Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc., 449 U.S. 33, 35, 101 S.Ct. 188, 66 L.Ed.2d 193 (1980). Accordingly, we deny the petition for mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.
449 U.S. 33 (Supreme Court, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 F. App'x 865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-williams-ca4-2004.