In re Williams

Fourth Circuit

In re Williams

512 F. App'x 309

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 28, 2013·No. No. 12-2278·Published

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gary Buterra Williams petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order compelling the district court to act on his petition for removal of a state prosecution. Since Williams filed his petition, however, the district court entered an order remanding the prosecution to state court. See Buterra v. Circuit Court for City of Suffolk, No. 3:11-cv-125-HEH, 2012 WL 6099090 (ED.Va. Dec. 7, 2012). We therefore deny Williams’ petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gary Buterra Williams petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order compelling the district court to act on his petition for removal of a state prosecution. Since Williams filed his petition, however, the district court entered an order remanding the prosecution to state court. See Buterra v. Circuit Court for City of Suffolk, No. 3:11-cv-125-HEH, 2012 WL 6099090 (ED.Va. Dec. 7, 2012). We therefore deny Williams’ petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

In re Williams, 512 F. App'x 309 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

512 F. App'x 309 (In re Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.