In re Williams
This text of 512 F. App'x 309 (In re Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Gary Buterra Williams petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order compelling the district court to act on his petition for removal of a state prosecution. Since Williams filed his petition, however, the district court entered an order remanding the prosecution to state court. See Buterra v. Circuit Court for City of Suffolk, No. 3:11-cv-125-HEH, 2012 WL 6099090 (ED.Va. Dec. 7, 2012). We therefore deny Williams’ petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
512 F. App'x 309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-williams-ca4-2013.