In re Williams

421 F. App'x 303
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 306 F. App'x 818
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 6, 2011·No. No. 10-2035·Published

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Stanley Lorenzo Williams petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his November 2010 motion seeking enforcement of the court’s September 2004 order granting relief in part on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. We find there has been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. Williams’ motion to expedite is denied as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Williams, 421 F. App'x 303 (4th Cir. 2011).

421 F. App'x 303 (In re Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related