In re Williams

589 F. App'x 74
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 600 F. App'x 126
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 22, 2014·No. No. 14-1982·Published

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Larry Sinclair Williams petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dis[75]*75pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Williams, 589 F. App'x 74 (4th Cir. 2014).

589 F. App'x 74 (In re Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related