In re Williams

Fourth Circuit

In re Williams

600 F. App'x 126

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 21, 2015·No. No. 15-1116·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Arvin Lee Williams petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his civil action. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis but deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Arvin Lee Williams petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his civil action. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis but deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

In re Williams, 600 F. App'x 126 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

600 F. App'x 126 (In re Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related