In Re: Williams

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In Re: Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 306 F. App'x 818
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 6, 2011·No. 10-2035·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2035

In Re: STANLEY LORENZO WILLIAMS,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:03-cv-00299-TDS-WWD)

Submitted: March 18, 2011 Decided: April 6, 2011

Before KING, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stanley Lorenzo Williams, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Stanley Lorenzo Williams petitions for a writ of

mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting

on his November 2010 motion seeking enforcement of the court’s

September 2004 order granting relief in part on his 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 (2006) petition. We find there has been no undue delay

in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus

petition. Williams’ motion to expedite is denied as moot. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re: Williams, (4th Cir. 2011).

In Re: Williams (In Re: Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related