Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re the Claim of Famulare

In re the Claim of Famulare

34 A.D.2d 705, 309 N.Y.S.2d 786, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5032
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 23, 1970·Published·Cited by 16 cases

Opinion

Cooke, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 9, 1967, which disqualified claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits on the ground that she left her employment voluntarily without good cause. The board was justified in concluding, in the case of this claimant secretary living at Huntington and working in New York City, that she was aware of the relevant conditions of her employment, prior to its commencement, and that no circumstances developed in the course of it which would have justified her refusing it in the first instance (Matter of Hcmsen [Catherwood], 31 A D 2d 680). The issue of what constitutes good cause under section 593 (subd. 1) of the Labor Law is factual and the board’s determination, supported as it is by substantial evidence, should not be disturbed (Matter of Palmieri [Catherwood], 33 A D 2d 588). Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur in memorandum by Cooke, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Famulare, 34 A.D.2d 705, 309 N.Y.S.2d 786, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5032 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

34 A.D.2d 705 (In re the Claim of Famulare) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Claim of Goldstein
183 A.D.2d 1088 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
In re the Claim of Maira
182 A.D.2d 962 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
In re the Claim of David
55 A.D.2d 770 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re the Claim of Dalland
53 A.D.2d 933 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re the Claim of Johnson
52 A.D.2d 1022 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re the Claim of Settle
52 A.D.2d 674 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re the Claim of Grossman
51 A.D.2d 853 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re the Claim of Edwards
51 A.D.2d 836 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re the Claim of Kormendi
51 A.D.2d 826 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re the Claim of Muzzio
51 A.D.2d 605 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re the Claim of Marcus
50 A.D.2d 1004 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
In re the Claim of Artz
50 A.D.2d 958 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
In re the Claim of Shleifstein
50 A.D.2d 704 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
In re the Claim of Silver
50 A.D.2d 639 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
In re the Claim of Biear
49 A.D.2d 980 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
In re the Claim of Revesz
49 A.D.2d 788 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)