Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re the Claim of Famulare

In re the Claim of Famulare

34 A.D.2d 705, 309 N.Y.S.2d 786, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5032
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 23, 1970
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 34 A.D.2d 705 (In re the Claim of Famulare) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Claim of Famulare, 34 A.D.2d 705, 309 N.Y.S.2d 786, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5032 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

Opinion

Cooke, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 9, 1967, which disqualified claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits on the ground that she left her employment voluntarily without good cause. The board was justified in concluding, in the case of this claimant secretary living at Huntington and working in New York City, that she was aware of the relevant conditions of her employment, prior to its commencement, and that no circumstances developed in the course of it which would have justified her refusing it in the first instance (Matter of Hcmsen [Catherwood], 31 A D 2d 680). The issue of what constitutes good cause under section 593 (subd. 1) of the Labor Law is factual and the board’s determination, supported as it is by substantial evidence, should not be disturbed (Matter of Palmieri [Catherwood], 33 A D 2d 588). Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur in memorandum by Cooke, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Claim of Goldstein
183 A.D.2d 1088 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
In re the Claim of Maira
182 A.D.2d 962 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
In re the Claim of David
55 A.D.2d 770 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re the Claim of Dalland
53 A.D.2d 933 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re the Claim of Johnson
52 A.D.2d 1022 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re the Claim of Settle
52 A.D.2d 674 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re the Claim of Grossman
51 A.D.2d 853 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re the Claim of Edwards
51 A.D.2d 836 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re the Claim of Kormendi
51 A.D.2d 826 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re the Claim of Muzzio
51 A.D.2d 605 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re the Claim of Marcus
50 A.D.2d 1004 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
In re the Claim of Artz
50 A.D.2d 958 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
In re the Claim of Shleifstein
50 A.D.2d 704 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
In re the Claim of Silver
50 A.D.2d 639 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
In re the Claim of Biear
49 A.D.2d 980 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
In re the Claim of Revesz
49 A.D.2d 788 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 A.D.2d 705, 309 N.Y.S.2d 786, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5032, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-famulare-nyappdiv-1970.