In re the Claim of Artz

50 A.D.2d 958, 375 N.Y.S.2d 696, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11909
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 4, 1975·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 23, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner holding claimant ineligible to receive benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause (Labor Law, § 593, subd 1, par [a]). The board’s decision as to good cause is factual and, since it is supported by substantial evidence, it must be affirmed (e.g., Matter of Famulare [Catherwood], 34 AD2d 705). The board on the instant record was not required to accept claimant’s justification for her resignation from employment. Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Sweeney, Koreman, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Artz, 50 A.D.2d 958, 375 N.Y.S.2d 696, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11909 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

50 A.D.2d 958 (In re the Claim of Artz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Claim of Goldstein
192 A.D.2d 919 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
In re the Claim of Sick
53 A.D.2d 727 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re the Claim of Kormendi
51 A.D.2d 826 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)