In re the Claim of Artz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Artz

50 A.D.2d 958, 375 N.Y.S.2d 696, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11909

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 4, 1975

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 50 A.D.2d 958 (In re the Claim of Artz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Artz, 50 A.D.2d 958, 375 N.Y.S.2d 696, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11909 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 23, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner holding claimant ineligible to receive benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause (Labor Law, § 593, subd 1, par [a]). The board’s decision as to good cause is factual and, since it is supported by substantial evidence, it must be affirmed (e.g., Matter of Famulare [Catherwood], 34 AD2d 705). The board on the instant record was not required to accept claimant’s justification for her resignation from employment. Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Sweeney, Koreman, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 23, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner holding claimant ineligible to receive benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause (Labor Law, § 593, subd 1, par [a]). The board’s decision as to good cause is factual and, since it is supported by substantial evidence, it must be affirmed (e.g., Matter of Famulare [Catherwood], 34 AD2d 705). The board on the instant record was not required to accept claimant’s justification for her resignation from employment. Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Sweeney, Koreman, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 958, 375 N.Y.S.2d 696, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11909, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-artz-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack