In re the Claim of Edwards

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Edwards

51 A.D.2d 836, 380 N.Y.S.2d 110, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11436

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 19, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 51 A.D.2d 836 (In re the Claim of Edwards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Edwards, 51 A.D.2d 836, 380 N.Y.S.2d 110, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11436 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 17, 1974, which reversed the decision of a referee and sustained the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits upon the ground that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. The claimant’s conclusion that the reduction in the number of publishing houses with which she was to negotiate for reprint contracts was a limitation of her authority and reflected upon her credibility at most raised a factual question. The issue of what constitutes good cause under subdivision 1 of section 593 of the Labor Law is factual, and the board’s decision, supported as it is here by substantial evidence, should not be disturbed (Matter of Famulare [Catherwood] 34 AD2d 705). Decision affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Main, Larkin, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 17, 1974, which reversed the decision of a referee and sustained the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits upon the ground that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. The claimant’s conclusion that the reduction in the number of publishing houses with which she was to negotiate for reprint contracts was a limitation of her authority and reflected upon her credibility at most raised a factual question. The issue of what constitutes good cause under subdivision 1 of section 593 of the Labor Law is factual, and the board’s decision, supported as it is here by substantial evidence, should not be disturbed (Matter of Famulare [Catherwood] 34 AD2d 705). Decision affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Main, Larkin, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.2d 836, 380 N.Y.S.2d 110, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-edwards-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack