In re the Claim of Settle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Settle

52 A.D.2d 674, 382 N.Y.S.2d 148, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12342

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 52 A.D.2d 674 (In re the Claim of Settle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Settle, 52 A.D.2d 674, 382 N.Y.S.2d 148, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12342 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 7, 1975, which reversed the decision of a referee overruling the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits on the ground that he left his employment without good cause. Claimant worked for the employer as an insurance underwriter for approximately 14 months. Although claimant alleges that he was forced to resign by his employer, the written resignation contains no such suggestion and he stated in writing that the reason for terminating his employment was that he realized the job "didn’t line in with my future career plans”. There is substantial evidence in this record to support the board’s determination on this question of fact and the determination should not be disturbed (Matter of Famulare [Catherwood], 34 AD2d 705; Matter of Scott [Catherwood] 31 AD2d 987). Decision affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Mahoney, Main, Larkin and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 7, 1975, which reversed the decision of a referee overruling the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits on the ground that he left his employment without good cause. Claimant worked for the employer as an insurance underwriter for approximately 14 months. Although claimant alleges that he was forced to resign by his employer, the written resignation contains no such suggestion and he stated in writing that the reason for terminating his employment was that he realized the job "didn’t line in with my future career plans”. There is substantial evidence in this record to support the board’s determination on this question of fact and the determination should not be disturbed (Matter of Famulare [Catherwood], 34 AD2d 705; Matter of Scott [Catherwood] 31 AD2d 987). Decision affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Mahoney, Main, Larkin and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 A.D.2d 674, 382 N.Y.S.2d 148, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-settle-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack