In re the Claim of Marcus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Marcus

50 A.D.2d 1004, 376 N.Y.S.2d 679, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11982

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 18, 1975

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 50 A.D.2d 1004 (In re the Claim of Marcus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Marcus, 50 A.D.2d 1004, 376 N.Y.S.2d 679, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11982 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 15, 1975, which reversed the decision of a referee and sustained the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits upon the ground that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause (Labor Law, § 593, subd 1, par [a]). The conflicting versions of the hiring arrangements given by the employer and the claimant presented sharp issues of fact and credibility for the board. Such issues are clearly within the province of the board and, since its resolution of those issues is supported by substantial evidence, its decision must be affirmed (cf. Matter of Famulare [Catherwood] 34 AD2d 705). Decision affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Sweeney, Kane, Koreman and Main, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 15, 1975, which reversed the decision of a referee and sustained the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits upon the ground that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause (Labor Law, § 593, subd 1, par [a]). The conflicting versions of the hiring arrangements given by the employer and the claimant presented sharp issues of fact and credibility for the board. Such issues are clearly within the province of the board and, since its resolution of those issues is supported by substantial evidence, its decision must be affirmed (cf. Matter of Famulare [Catherwood] 34 AD2d 705). Decision affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Sweeney, Kane, Koreman and Main, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 1004, 376 N.Y.S.2d 679, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11982, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-marcus-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack