In re the Claim of Biear

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Biear

49 A.D.2d 980, 374 N.Y.S.2d 374, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11295

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 30, 1975

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 49 A.D.2d 980 (In re the Claim of Biear) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Biear, 49 A.D.2d 980, 374 N.Y.S.2d 374, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11295 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 21, 1974, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner holding that the claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits effective April 24, 1974 because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. There is substantial evidence to support the finding that claimant left his employment to spend a week in Florida [981]*981without any authorization from his employer. Accordingly, we must affirm (Matter of Famulare [Catherwood], 34 AD2d 705). Decision affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Kane, Koreman, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 21, 1974, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner holding that the claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits effective April 24, 1974 because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. There is substantial evidence to support the finding that claimant left his employment to spend a week in Florida [981]*981without any authorization from his employer. Accordingly, we must affirm (Matter of Famulare [Catherwood], 34 AD2d 705). Decision affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Kane, Koreman, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A.D.2d 980, 374 N.Y.S.2d 374, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-biear-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack