In Re: Dow Corning Corporation
This text of 81 F.3d 635 (In Re: Dow Corning Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
81 F.3d 635w
64 USLW 2632, 28 Bankr.Ct.Dec. 1138
In re: DOW CORNING CORPORATION, Debtor.
Heidi LINDSEY, et al.; Official Committee of Tort
Claimants, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
O'BRIEN, TANSKI, TANZER AND YOUNG HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS OF
CONNECTICUT, et al., Defendants,
Dow Corning Corporation; The Dow Chemical Company
(95-2034/2107); Corning Inc. (95-2107); Baxter Healthcare
Corporation; Baxter International Inc. (95-2082);
Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. (95-2084);
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.; Medical Engineering Corporation
(95-2106), Defendants-Appellants.
Nos. 95-2034, 95-2082, 95-2084,
95-2106 and 95-2107.
United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.
Argued March 5, 1996.
Decided April 9, 1996.
NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
81 F.3d 635, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 6885, 28 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-dow-corning-corporation-ca6-1996.