In Re: Dow Corning Corporation

81 F.3d 635, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 6885, 28 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1138
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In Re: Dow Corning Corporation. Read the opinion of the Court — 86 F.3d 482
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided April 9, 1996·No. 95-2034·Published

Opinion

81 F.3d 635w

64 USLW 2632, 28 Bankr.Ct.Dec. 1138

In re: DOW CORNING CORPORATION, Debtor.
Heidi LINDSEY, et al.; Official Committee of Tort
Claimants, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
O'BRIEN, TANSKI, TANZER AND YOUNG HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS OF
CONNECTICUT, et al., Defendants,
Dow Corning Corporation; The Dow Chemical Company
(95-2034/2107); Corning Inc. (95-2107); Baxter Healthcare
Corporation; Baxter International Inc. (95-2082);
Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. (95-2084);
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.; Medical Engineering Corporation
(95-2106), Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 95-2034, 95-2082, 95-2084,
95-2106 and 95-2107.

United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.

Argued March 5, 1996.
Decided April 9, 1996.

NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re: Dow Corning Corporation, 81 F.3d 635, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 6885, 28 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1138 (6th Cir. 1996).

81 F.3d 635 (In Re: Dow Corning Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.