Hitoshi Yoshikawa v. Troy Seguirant

Ninth Circuit

Hitoshi Yoshikawa v. Troy Seguirant

59 F.4th 998

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 13, 2023

Docket21-15970

StatusPublished

This text of 59 F.4th 998 (Hitoshi Yoshikawa v. Troy Seguirant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hitoshi Yoshikawa v. Troy Seguirant, 59 F.4th 998 (9th Cir. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 13 2023 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HITOSHI YOSHIKAWA, No. 21-15970

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:18-cv-00162-JAO-RT v. District of Hawaii, Honolulu TROY K. SEGUIRANT, Individually, ORDER Defendant-Appellant,

and

CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU; GREG TALBOYS; AGT CONSTRUCTION, LLC; JAMES A. SCHMIT,

Defendants.

MURGUIA, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.

Judge Bennett did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI